About Me

Name: Noam D. Gear
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/

Stupid is, Also, as Stupid Doesn't

“Stupid is as stupid does”, said Mama Gump.
Building from there, I would now add, "Stupid is, also, as stupid does not"

I realized this second rule upon seeing a Congress does both of the following.
  • Rails against mortgage brokers who trick people into signing documents before they can read or understand them
  • Insists that bills spending trillions of dollars should be voted upon without anyone having time to read or understand them.
With the new Democrat Government, it appears that the larger the dollar figure spent in a bill, the less time is spent reading it or debating it Congress. Comparing the time spent on Bush’s stimulus (26 days for $145 Billion) to the time spent on Obama’s stimulus (one day for $780 Billion), I estimate that a new bill proposing to spend $810 Billion could possibly be voted upon prior to being written, printed, or handed out to members of Congress.

Yesterdays “Cap and Trade”energy tax was voted upon with no time for reading, but Obama’s Stimulus was his first that nobody had time to read. That bill spent money at roughly $700 Million per page for over a thousand pages.  We were told all of the following tales about it:
  • The Bill must pass right now, or there will be certain doom;
  • If we waste mere minutes to cut out all the pork projects, the country could fail;
  • The Stimulus will “kickstart” the economy;
  • Fraud, corruption, and abuse will be stopped by Joe Biden and his staff;
  • We repeat, the Bill must pass right now, or there will be certain doom.

Mind you, these are the same people who:
  • Accused George Bush of lurching the country into hasty decisions based upon fear mongering and concocted stories of imminent doom
  • Accused the media of laying down their journalistic integrity out of false fear.
  • Promised to have the most open, honest, transparent, and ethical government ever. 
Ha!  What twaddle!

Worst of all, these are the same people who constantly applaud each other for how smart they are, and how smart their staff, supporters, and advisors are also.  They are all so much smarter than common dolts who do stupid stuff like reading documents before signing on the line, and looking at their account balance before writing a check.

So far, I’m sorry, but I don’t anything remotely “smart” in our new government.  I see a diverse array of stupid ideas, stupid legislation, and stupid people pervading the whole thing.  I don’t trust any of them to dispose of my income in a smarter, fairer, better, or more ethical manner than I can for myself; and I deeply disrespect the devoutly gullible voters who fell for the campaign promises that this Government could.


Tags: congress  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Words Not Worth The Air They Are Printed Upon

 
Like millions of Americans this week, I watched the video clip of the killing of Neda Soltani by Iranian thugs who were trying to stop citizens from protesting the sham election of Ahmadinijad.  The sight of her young face becoming flooded with her own blood has indelibly stained my mind in a way that shall not soon fade.
 
This may be horribly un-politically-correct.  However, I must confess that upon seeing the video, I wished that I had been there to stop, deter, harm, or even kill the shooter before he shot Neda Soltani.
 
“Violence is not the answer!” is the banal slogan often chanted by people who stand by while brutal regimes slaughter innocent people. In this slogan, cowardice is perfumed with pacifism so that it smells just like moral virtue.  If you add in the busy shuffling of important documents between your left and right hands…while sniffing your own perfume…while the brutal murders continue all around you… then you have a picture of the United Nations, or its army of tender-minded liberals from the “International Community”. They now call themselves “Foreign Policy Realists”.  It sounds loftier than “Betitled Spectators of Carnage”.
 
The video of Neda moved me to search and find that only one in twenty Iranians own a gun that could have been used to shoot the sniper. If I “Bing” the Internet correctly, it appears that Iran has very restrictive gun laws.  No surprise there. Most oppressive regimes quickly enact laws to take guns from citizens.  Guns are horribly unsafe, you know--just ask Mahmoud Ahmadinijad, Daniel Ortega, Robert Mugabe, Than Shwe ….  They all agree.
 
I wish that President Obama had denounced the Ahmadinijad regime long before the opinion surveys dragged him into it. How could a man who works himself into moral slather over three terrorists being water-boarded seven years ago, now be so blasé about the open-air slaughter of dozens of non-terrorists this very week?  Where else in history has Obama ever closed his mouth and avoided cameras as a tactic of persuasion?
 
Neda Soltani, God blessed us with you.  You have done more to liberate Iran than ten trucks full of United Nations Documents; more than a lake full of pacifist perfume; and more than the sterile, halting, and belated pronouncements of our pitiful “Rock Star” President. His utterances are not worth the air that they are printed upon.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sotomayor as the New Archie Bunker

Can you see Judge Sotomayor as the new “Archie Bunker” of our time?
Me too, and not just because she has the same body as Archie Bunker. 
•    She sounds like Archie Bunker.
•    People respond to her like they responded to Archie Bunker.
•    People around her are behaving like Edith Bunker.
•    There is also a new “Meathead”, played by a cast of conservative Republicans.
Can you hear the new “Archie” announce this nugget of racial truth from his brown chair in front of the television set?
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

“Hey, Edith! Get me a beer.  I’m dying of thirst over here.  Gheeeez!”

The new Edith Bunker is played by “moderate” Republicans who insist on the same course of action that Edith Bunker always took:
•    Dummy up!
•    Stifle yourself, and don’t provoke “Archie”.
•    Be quiet and stay in your kitchen.
•    Find ways to praise “Archie” for good qualities and accomplishments--which don't exist.
•    Tell people that it is best if they don’t provoke "Archie", or argue with "Archie".
•    Go get "Archie" a beer, or, in this case, a Supreme Court Appointment.

Does anyone out there wish to take a crack at rearranging the theme song?
Could be fun.

Noam

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bing It For Yourself

I have been looking for a good alternative to Google for a while now, and I was happy to hear about Bing.
Today, I took Bing for a test drive by searching "French Military Victories".

Bing passed the test.

Click here to see the results for yourself.

Noam
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Olberman-- Worn Out Tool

Behold Keith trying to hack at Cheney's superior speech on National Security.
Keith's mouth moved, but all I heard was the sound of a drill bit slipping.



Tags: Olby  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Obama will Confront His "Straw Man" Reputation

Being known as a Straw-Man artist is very dangerous thing for a Straw-Man artist.

Obama's only skill is rhretoric.  After that, he is a bungling theoretician, and a blinking noobie.
If he allows the glossy veneer of his rhetoric to be chipped, the world will begin to see the plywood that makes up the other 95% of him.  People will easily see that Obama is actually a bungling theoretician, and that he has no clue what he is doing, and that he is in WAY over his head.

I predict that:
  • Obama will move very decisively to nip this budding reputation for faulty reasoning.
  • Axelrod will plant a pre-designed question into a press conference.
  • Obama will appear to provide a Straw Man, but it won't be. 
  • A reporter will point out the apparent Straw-Man
  • Obama will boldly and sternly rebuke the premise of the question and express annoyance that this is "another example" of somebody thinking they caught him in a Straw-Man Argument.


Look for a phony exchange with a reporter that goes something like this:


Reporter:  President Obama could you describe why you think it best to continue on with further bailouts of GM, and why the government should get involved with GMAC?

Obama:  Well, some have said that we should avoid this action with GMAC, but I say that we cannot deal effectively with the trouble in the automotive sector without dealing with each kind of trouble in the automotive sector.  GM had problems in its credit business that were just as serious as the problems with health care costs.   And so, I am not interested in curing half of this patient. We need to cure the whole patient.

Reporter: But, Mr. President, nobody is really arguing against you in that manner.  Might that not be a little bit of a straw man argument you are using?

Obama:  Absolutely not!  And, frankly, these people who don’t hear the criticisms that I do should check their facts.  You should know that _____________, the Republican from ____________ made this criticism of me while he was eating dinner alone with his wife.  If you were a better reporter, you would have known that before confronting me with this Straw-Man baloney.  Seriously people…we have some work to do here.

Poof…just like that…Obama will slay yet another Straw Man, and will quash his critics, and cow reporters into never noticing his Straw Men again.  

Actually, the exchange will have the bonus in making Obama look like he has command of factual background knowledge superior to that of the "journalists" before him.  The gullible tots of the WHPC will adore him more than ever after he does this to them.

Mark it down.  Predicted on the morning of Memorial Day, 2009.





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gitmo Prisoners Will Recruit Inmates in our Prison System

Keep your eyes on two things people.
  1. Obama suggests that Maximum Security Prisons are strong enough to hold the Gitmo detainees, but that is no promise that he will actually put them there.  For all we know, he will strike another triangular political compromise.  For all we know, he will toss another bone to his base of stoner crack-head leftists.  Obama could wind up putting the Gitmo detainees in medium-security prisons, or lower.
  2. At Gitmo, terrorists cannot recruit other terrorists because all the inmates around them are already terrorists.  Diluting gitmo detainees into the unspoiled fruitbowl of ordinary murderers, felons, and drug dealers... and others who are eligible for parole... incredibly stupid.  Compounding this is that financial problems could trigger the early release of those who were flipped by the terrorists while they were in prison togeter.  Not just any kind of stupid.  It's Harvard Stupid.
Get ready for another Obama special.  A well-worded policy that is crap to the core.

Noam





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let Obamaphiles Buy and Drive Obamobiles

No more Honda or Toyota minivans for suburban soccer mom's who supported Obama.
No more BMWs, Lexus, Audi, or Mercedes for upscale urban Democrat liberals.

Nope, Nope, Nope.



From now on, we should demand that Democrats make their whole car into their political statement--not just the rear bumper. They should put their check book where their Obama-Biden stickers are.

From now on, if we don't see the one or two most sanctimonious liberals that we each know driving themselves about town in a brand new "Obamobile" (Chrysler or GM), then they are dirty stinking hypocrites, and we should not miss the opportunity to expose them as such.

In a humble and concerned manner, please ask them:

  • How come you aren't supporting Obama's plan to rescue the economy and the auto industry? 
  • How could you buy that Toyota in a time like this?  Isn't that economic treason
  • Didn't you just tell me that you wished Bush had asked us to make sacrifices in our lifestyles?
  • How could you possibly drive a car that was assembled in a Republican state?
  • Did a UAW worker assemble that, or did you pay for scab labor?
  • Spare parts for thee, but not for me?
  • Does the Federal Chysler Department process warrantee claims faster or slower than green card applications?
I look forward to the Obama/Biden 2012 Bumpersticker becoming the most reliable mechanical component of any new Obamobile, and I look forward to thousands of liberal-bumper-sticker-clad Obamobiles breaking down and proudly littering the ditches of America's roads--as people realize that they may as well just leave it there because that is the least costly option since Obama closed their local dealership anyhow.

The wreckage will provide the Twitter Generation with enduring monuments to honor their own stupidity in thinking that electing a communist didn't matter much.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Affirmative Action Bakesale Becomes Democrat Law

The “Affirmative Action Bake Sale” concept drives the left crazy, but it is precisely what they will bring upon the whole economy with the Credit Card legislation passed today. People who pay their bills will also pay the bills for people who don’t pay their bills. There will certainly be three sub-trends in the new financial flow from the "haves" to the "have-nots"; race, party affiliation, and credit score. And so, the new law will create an Affirmative Action Bake Sale out of our credit card system.

The new law will instantly drive non-fools to use cash transactions…which will force credit card companies to raise fees on the remaining fools they have...which will cause more of those fools to become non-fools...etc....until the credit card companies are out of business, owing to the fact that their only remaining customers will be those who don’t pay their bills.   Duh!

Once this legislation produces its unintended disaster, I predict that Congress will be faced with a new demand to pass new legislation that will force businesses to charge higher prices for goods if they are purchased with cash. The added prices will then pay the bills of democrat voters and other financially irresponsible people. Precisely at that moment, a bakery owners could put out the following sign...as though it were an Affirmative Action Bake Sale.

Cookies of All Varieties For Sale

Ask for Federal pricing matrix* at the checkout.

Have the following information available:

·         Racial background

·         Credit History

·         Voter Registration

·         *All Cookie prices determined in accordance with Federal Law

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fighting Conservatives Is Futile

One last caboose of a thought for tonight.

Remember what we all learned from the MSM about the war in Iraq?

"When you fight bad people, you only enable them to recruit more bad people".

Of course, we Conservatives are not so gullible as to actually believe a word of it, but I take the time to repeat this Liberal canard back to Liberals...so to remind them that fighting against conservatives is absolutely counterproductive because it will only enhance our recruitment of other conservatives. 

Remember that, you liberals, before you Troll our Blogs.

Fighting us makes more of us.  Lay down your keyboards and take a nap.
Show us that you follow your own moral orthodoxy.  Prove your morality.  Go away.

Noam



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Lead Goose Project--(Reader Participation)



If you were shooting geese, where would you aim?

Would you aim at the center of the flock, which is the average location of flock?
Or would you aim slightly ahead of one goose, perhaps the lead goose?

Easy...you aim ahead of one goose—the lead goose.  Okay, with that settled, we move onward we go into the tricky business of fighting liberals in the public arena of political discourse.

I fear that conservatives are wasting too much of our rhetorical ammunition shooting at the center of the flock--and hitting nothing.  There are a many of us, but there are many thousands of liberal geese dropping their excrement on every aspect of the country.  Many of the geese have names:
  • Rampant Corruption
  • Skyrocketing debt
  • Moral degradation, and numbness to it
  • Sycophantic media
  • Education becoming indoctrination
  • Defective Republicans participating at the edges or center of all of the above
  • The list goes on for a thousand miles
We cannot continue to focus on all of them, lest we become mere makers of encyclopediae. 
We will be known for having sat upon the sidelines and prattled upon our keyboards while our civilization crumbled.

We cannot focus on all of them.  Focusing on everything is no focus at all.
We need to focus on one issue or one person, maybe two. 
And then go after that person and that issue with everything we have…even if it isn’t the one person that 40% of us care about the most.  If you wind up in the 40%, be patient, your goose will come sooner if you help us with the first one.

But which goose, which person, which issue should get our focus first?

Each day, when a liberal wakes up, they look for some person who lives according to a set of principles and they set about the task of smashing that person to pieces, if they can.  Liberals have a reward system based upon the style and flair with which they can do the smashing.  They get brownie points for how funny it is, how clever it is, how urbane and sophisticated they look while doing it. That is the source of smug smile printed in the permafrost flesh of Rachel Madow's "face".  She knows she is winning the contest with other Liberals. Liberals get brownie points for debunking everything under the sun, except for themselves. I know there is nothing new here so far, but hang on. 

What is new is that liberals have learned to spontaneously agree upon, identify, and smash a common target at the same time.  They probably learned this skill from the Coyotes that raised them, who knows?  Anyhow, they coordinate their attacks, and make them very effective that way. It isn’t clear to me whether it is an actual coordination, or more like simple mob behavior.  But they do coordinate.  And the sad fact is that conservatives need to coordinate more like they do.



It is time for conservatives to turn the tables. We need to identify the sacred institutions and people of the left, and begin to trash them, in a synchronous, coordinated and systematic fashion--exactly as they have done to us.

After seeing the “lead goose” get "shot out of the air", what goose wants to eagerly sign up to take his place? Who wants to be the next Rush Limbaugh, or Tom Delay? Look at the frivolous ethics complaints that rain down upon Sarah Palin.  There is no coincidence there, just liberal malice that goes unanswered by the civil, gentle, and kind people of the right—especially the Christian right.

We conservatives have a problem with our focus.  Because we have real jobs and real families and limited time, we fight our political battles with snips and snaps, here and there.  No time for rhyme or reason.  We don’t have time to wait for the perfect shot at the perfect target, so we shoot our guns at geese, and airplanes, and decoys, and clouds, and stars, and the sun, and whatever-the-hell else is passing over our heads. 

We must stop all that.

We need to figure out one single "lead goose" and coordinate ourselves.

We need to shut off our televisions, put away our toys, and fight the people who are preparing to enslave our children with debt, disease, and poverty…and every other problem that will be foisted upon us by Liberals...so that they can "rescue" us from those same problems later.  Without such problems in the world, Liberals wouldn’t be needed. 

Liberals are firemen by day, and arsonists by night.  Even a Pastor I know works hard at restoring the smashed lives of teenagers, while also supporting policies and people who did the smashing in the first place.  It would be far better if the teenagers weren’t smashed in the first place, don’t you think?

Saul Alinski’s book, “Rules for Radicals” has coached the Democrats to “make it very personal”.  Likewise, we need to make it personal.  Within the one issue we pick, we need single out one person and go to work—making that person the “face” of the problem.

To be clear (so clear that Slowberman could understand), violence and hunting are only a metaphor here.  As the left has done, we will use legal tools of influence only. We will use research, calls, protests, research, heckling, annoyance, research, letter writing, FOA, civil disobedience, ethics filings, law suits, web-clogging, trolling, exposure, research, more exposure, and then hopefully-at-last the utter discrediting of the liberal at hand…followed by the next.  I have a new word for this process.  I call it “Civics”.  I hope it replaces television some day.

So...no more talk of broad, diffuse, and faceless issues.  No more litanies of grievances, or burlap sacks full of complaints that lead to nowhere.  We need to figure out who is the single most deserving person for the treatment we have received from the political left. So…I present you…

“THE LEAD GOOSE PROJECT”. 

We need to nominate, vote upon, and agree upon a liberal “goose” that is fat, ugly, out in the open, loud, low, and likely to have many “bones in the closet”.  Somebody for whom the establishment media will mount a reflexive defense at first…and then betray when the rest of the truth comes out.  Note here that few liberals have enough money to purchase Human Condoms that protected the likes of Bill Clinton.

A Human Condom is a person who is paid to go on onto television and protect their master even after their master has soiled them on all surfaces—inside and out.  Human Condoms include Lanny Davis, Paul Begala, James Carville, and Donna Brazile; and they are much more expensive than latex condoms.  There are only a dozen or so Human Condoms in the whole country.  Obama is wearing six of them, and so we may have the good fortune to find that the others are short supply.

[I excluded Keith Olberman here because he is more like a condom that somehow soiled itself…even without a master.  Nobody really wants to pick him up and put him on, though he would be delighted for somebody to try.]

Our Lead Goose should be somebody who makes a big mess on their way out of power.  Somebody who will clutch at other Liberals, and then lose their grip in the slime.  I could go on, but you get the idea.

Please communicate this URL to friends by email, blog comments, phone…whatever.
I hope we could get the project onto HotAir or Rushbo.  We need thousands of inputs before we announce the “regional quarter-finals” of the selection process.
Part of what will un-nerve the lead goose in the very early going will be the knowledge that they were selected from among thousands and selected by thousands…using a completely democratic process.

Invite each Conservative to participate by submitting nominations.  Each nomination should shed some new light on the goose they nominate, if possible.  I will tabulate inputs over time and keep you all abreast of progress. 

Let the nominations pour in (below)!!!

All for now.

Thanks,
Noam








Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

United States of Zimbabwe

“The economy will get worse before it gets better.”  I have heard this predictive promise often since January, from many people and in many settings.
 
Because I was raised in Upstate New York, my ears are keenly tuned to this message of hope.  New York is stuck in its 25th year of “getting worse before it gets better”. For New Yorkers, liberal social policies have been delivering the first half (e.g. “getting worse”) of that deal for almost three decades. And now, Obama has announced that these policies will guide the whole country.
 
Obama explains, “we must build our house upon a rock, and must lay a new foundation”. Notice here that Obama uses Bible phrases to peddle his new plan.  However, his real meaning comes from his Budget Plan, not the Bible.
 
The “Rock” is the Rock of a $16 Trillion National debt that will pay for the free stuff he has budgeted for his supporters. He will grow our debt to surpass our GDP; almost tripling the National Debt by 2015. In practical terms, that would be like taking out a second and third mortgage on your house and using all of that money to throw a party for the people who approved the loans. 
 
The African country of Zimbabwe is a glittering example of how debt-based populism makes the economy “get worse before it gets better”.  President Mugabe ran his country’s debt to about 2.2 times higher than its GDP. He spent the money on his supporters, and then he inflated his currency in order to repay his creditors with worthless paper.  As a result, his country now has 22 million percent inflation, a chronic famine, and massive death, exodus, and depopulation—right in the “breadbasket of Africa”.  Citizens walk around with $10 Billion Bills in their pockets (ZWD Notes), which are not enough to purchase a meal. People who complain too loudly are shot.  In sum, Zimbabwe is a wretched genocidal utopia of Marxist “Social Justice”. It never got better, it just got worse.
 
Obama’s new “Foundation” is simply Government Employment.  Once Obama takes capital from the “wealthiest Americans” and uses it for interest payments to China, then more private enterprise will collapse. Obama will try to absorb the massive unemployment he creates by hiring millions of people into “shovel-ready” jobs for the government.
 
Cuba is a good example of what happens when Government employs everyone after it wipes out private business.  The Castro Family Government employs about 90% of the work force in Cuba. Doctors and cab drivers earn about the same pay—which is about $20 per month. Only the ruling Socialist dictators earn much higher pay, because they perform the hard work of making sure that everyone else is “equal” to each other.
 
After 100 days of the Obama Telethon, I pause to note that his new “House”, “Rock”, and “Foundation” are a dangerous sham. I refuse to believe in a President who triples the debt accrued by all previous presidents combined…telling us that it will build a great economy somehow. 

Hogwash!

History strongly suggests that this country will drown, not sail, in its new ocean of debt.
 
It is ironic that the President received an education from an elite college, then a degree from an elite law school, then lectured at a different law school, then worked as a “community organizer”, and then used inspiring oratory to overcome his own lack of experience, and so won his first term as President of Zimbabwe. Yes, President Mugabe won by a landslide in 1980 after delivering electrifying speeches to enormous rallies of supporters.  They believed that he was incredibly smart, charismatic, and that he would surely rescue them from the injustices of prosperity. And he did.
 
Another irony is that some of the Christians, for whom Obama uses Bible words, can use one breath to pray for God to alleviate the suffering in Zimbabwe, and another breath to pray for Obama to succeed with Marx’s Social Justice here in America. 

If you are a liberal reader then rejoice in knowing that my writing will get far worse before it gets any better.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Second Coming of Robert Mugabe

See Mark Sanford’s comments today

I am surprised and delighted to see that other people are beginning to see the similarity between President Mugabe in Zimbabwe and President Obama in America.

Allow me to expand it for you:
  • Both Obama and Mugabe went to elite Universities (Princeton; Oxford) 
  • Both got degrees from elite Law Schools.  (one from Harvard; two from University of London).
  • Both spent a while teaching and lecturing at a Law School. (Chicago; Zambia)
  • Both are intellectuals of reputation.
  • Both were “community organizers” (Chicago; Rhodesia)
  • Both of them are fantastic orators.  (Do you need proof?)
  • Both of them have countries with abundant and fertile agricultural lands.
  • Both of them rose to power from a new political base of young people who were persuaded that they had “no hope” without their leader.  (Pol Pot too, by the way)
  • Mugabe created a security force by hiring up many people from among his young political base of previously-hopeless people.  His security force was used to extract money and belongings from the rich and give them to the poor.  The part about giving to the poor was completely forgotten at the half-way point.  Obama has proposed the “Civilian National Security Force” that would be “as large and well funded as the US Army”.  No telling what he will use them to accomplish.
  • Both of them use Marx’s “Social Justice” rhetoric liberally when stoking their political base.
  • Both stress “Economic Justice”, and redistribution of as central to their mission.
  • Neither of them had any prior experience in managing an organization, much less a government.
  • Both fight/fought  Catholic Hospitals that served the poor.  Mugabe wanted to impose high tax on the imported medicines that were being distributed (free) to the poor.  Obama will sign FOCA and force Catholics to perform abortions—or quit medicine.
  • Both of them took immediate action to quash critics when their ideas began to fail severely.
  • Both rely on printing money to devalue currency to cope with their own budgetary incontinence—which is astronomical.  More about that later.
The similarities become smaller and less distinguishing after this.  Plus, we are only 50 days in.

Mugabe went on to use his “Security Force” to seize farms from farmers so that he could give the land to the “the poor”.  In this case, “the poor” were Mugabe’s political contributors and high-ranking  officials in his Security Force.  These people knew nothing about farming and they created a durable famine that is slowly killing 40% of the population in a region that had been known as “The Bread Basket of Africa”.  The famine is now being helped along by an outbreak of cholera, which could have been treated with medicine at Catholic Hospitals, but…oops.  Another million or more fled to Zambia and other countries. 

When inflation in the US reaches 22,000,000% per year like Zimbabwe, and when the super-intellectual Obama orders the treasury to print new $100,000,000,000-dollar notes (with his own image) so that people can use one of these notes to pay for groceries… then we will know for sure that we actually elected the second-coming of Mugabe as our president.  Of course, half of us will be dead by then.  And speaking of death…

If simple scale is applied, and if Obama manages to involve the agricultural base of the USA into one of his “Fairness” programs, then Obama’s famine will starve about 150 million Americans to death.  For comparison, that would be approximately: 70 Million more death than Mao; 120 Million more than Stalin; 60 fold more than Pol Pot; and 30-fold more than Robert Mugabe. 

I just wonder whether Obama will be the clear winner of the competition with other legendary leaders of “Social Justice”, or will he just take a spot in the middle of the pack somewhere.  Time will tell.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »