About Me

Name: Noam D. Gear
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/

United States of Zimbabwe

“The economy will get worse before it gets better.”  I have heard this predictive promise often since January, from many people and in many settings.
 
Because I was raised in Upstate New York, my ears are keenly tuned to this message of hope.  New York is stuck in its 25th year of “getting worse before it gets better”. For New Yorkers, liberal social policies have been delivering the first half (e.g. “getting worse”) of that deal for almost three decades. And now, Obama has announced that these policies will guide the whole country.
 
Obama explains, “we must build our house upon a rock, and must lay a new foundation”. Notice here that Obama uses Bible phrases to peddle his new plan.  However, his real meaning comes from his Budget Plan, not the Bible.
 
The “Rock” is the Rock of a $16 Trillion National debt that will pay for the free stuff he has budgeted for his supporters. He will grow our debt to surpass our GDP; almost tripling the National Debt by 2015. In practical terms, that would be like taking out a second and third mortgage on your house and using all of that money to throw a party for the people who approved the loans. 
 
The African country of Zimbabwe is a glittering example of how debt-based populism makes the economy “get worse before it gets better”.  President Mugabe ran his country’s debt to about 2.2 times higher than its GDP. He spent the money on his supporters, and then he inflated his currency in order to repay his creditors with worthless paper.  As a result, his country now has 22 million percent inflation, a chronic famine, and massive death, exodus, and depopulation—right in the “breadbasket of Africa”.  Citizens walk around with $10 Billion Bills in their pockets (ZWD Notes), which are not enough to purchase a meal. People who complain too loudly are shot.  In sum, Zimbabwe is a wretched genocidal utopia of Marxist “Social Justice”. It never got better, it just got worse.
 
Obama’s new “Foundation” is simply Government Employment.  Once Obama takes capital from the “wealthiest Americans” and uses it for interest payments to China, then more private enterprise will collapse. Obama will try to absorb the massive unemployment he creates by hiring millions of people into “shovel-ready” jobs for the government.
 
Cuba is a good example of what happens when Government employs everyone after it wipes out private business.  The Castro Family Government employs about 90% of the work force in Cuba. Doctors and cab drivers earn about the same pay—which is about $20 per month. Only the ruling Socialist dictators earn much higher pay, because they perform the hard work of making sure that everyone else is “equal” to each other.
 
After 100 days of the Obama Telethon, I pause to note that his new “House”, “Rock”, and “Foundation” are a dangerous sham. I refuse to believe in a President who triples the debt accrued by all previous presidents combined…telling us that it will build a great economy somehow. 

Hogwash!

History strongly suggests that this country will drown, not sail, in its new ocean of debt.
 
It is ironic that the President received an education from an elite college, then a degree from an elite law school, then lectured at a different law school, then worked as a “community organizer”, and then used inspiring oratory to overcome his own lack of experience, and so won his first term as President of Zimbabwe. Yes, President Mugabe won by a landslide in 1980 after delivering electrifying speeches to enormous rallies of supporters.  They believed that he was incredibly smart, charismatic, and that he would surely rescue them from the injustices of prosperity. And he did.
 
Another irony is that some of the Christians, for whom Obama uses Bible words, can use one breath to pray for God to alleviate the suffering in Zimbabwe, and another breath to pray for Obama to succeed with Marx’s Social Justice here in America. 

If you are a liberal reader then rejoice in knowing that my writing will get far worse before it gets any better.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Second Coming of Robert Mugabe

See Mark Sanford’s comments today

I am surprised and delighted to see that other people are beginning to see the similarity between President Mugabe in Zimbabwe and President Obama in America.

Allow me to expand it for you:
  • Both Obama and Mugabe went to elite Universities (Princeton; Oxford) 
  • Both got degrees from elite Law Schools.  (one from Harvard; two from University of London).
  • Both spent a while teaching and lecturing at a Law School. (Chicago; Zambia)
  • Both are intellectuals of reputation.
  • Both were “community organizers” (Chicago; Rhodesia)
  • Both of them are fantastic orators.  (Do you need proof?)
  • Both of them have countries with abundant and fertile agricultural lands.
  • Both of them rose to power from a new political base of young people who were persuaded that they had “no hope” without their leader.  (Pol Pot too, by the way)
  • Mugabe created a security force by hiring up many people from among his young political base of previously-hopeless people.  His security force was used to extract money and belongings from the rich and give them to the poor.  The part about giving to the poor was completely forgotten at the half-way point.  Obama has proposed the “Civilian National Security Force” that would be “as large and well funded as the US Army”.  No telling what he will use them to accomplish.
  • Both of them use Marx’s “Social Justice” rhetoric liberally when stoking their political base.
  • Both stress “Economic Justice”, and redistribution of as central to their mission.
  • Neither of them had any prior experience in managing an organization, much less a government.
  • Both fight/fought  Catholic Hospitals that served the poor.  Mugabe wanted to impose high tax on the imported medicines that were being distributed (free) to the poor.  Obama will sign FOCA and force Catholics to perform abortions—or quit medicine.
  • Both of them took immediate action to quash critics when their ideas began to fail severely.
  • Both rely on printing money to devalue currency to cope with their own budgetary incontinence—which is astronomical.  More about that later.
The similarities become smaller and less distinguishing after this.  Plus, we are only 50 days in.

Mugabe went on to use his “Security Force” to seize farms from farmers so that he could give the land to the “the poor”.  In this case, “the poor” were Mugabe’s political contributors and high-ranking  officials in his Security Force.  These people knew nothing about farming and they created a durable famine that is slowly killing 40% of the population in a region that had been known as “The Bread Basket of Africa”.  The famine is now being helped along by an outbreak of cholera, which could have been treated with medicine at Catholic Hospitals, but…oops.  Another million or more fled to Zambia and other countries. 

When inflation in the US reaches 22,000,000% per year like Zimbabwe, and when the super-intellectual Obama orders the treasury to print new $100,000,000,000-dollar notes (with his own image) so that people can use one of these notes to pay for groceries… then we will know for sure that we actually elected the second-coming of Mugabe as our president.  Of course, half of us will be dead by then.  And speaking of death…

If simple scale is applied, and if Obama manages to involve the agricultural base of the USA into one of his “Fairness” programs, then Obama’s famine will starve about 150 million Americans to death.  For comparison, that would be approximately: 70 Million more death than Mao; 120 Million more than Stalin; 60 fold more than Pol Pot; and 30-fold more than Robert Mugabe. 

I just wonder whether Obama will be the clear winner of the competition with other legendary leaders of “Social Justice”, or will he just take a spot in the middle of the pack somewhere.  Time will tell.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cruelty We Can Believe In

As we see people evicted from their homes, I ask readers not to get caught up in the false debate as to whether we should blame banks, bankers, home-buyers… for the banking crisis now at hand

None of those is to blame.

A far more deserving target of blame is Barney Frank, the insane US congressman from Massachusetts.  He bears great responsibility for advancing the legislation in 1995 that required banks to make loans to people who could not afford to repay them.  In the same stroke, he wiped out the regulations that would have stopped the lending when critical thresholds of insolvency were reached. Mr. Frank did this knowing that it could destabilize the banking system of the country, and yet he did it anyway.

This is like cutting the break cables on the car and then removing the guardrails from the road.  All of the burning wreckage we have now is a direct consequence of his actions. Amazingly, even after seeing six months of burning wreckage all over the economy, Mr. Frank is proud of his “accomplishment”.

I encourage readers to search for “Community Reinvestment Act” (CRA) and watch the old C-SPAN video of Barney Frank and Andrew Cuomo arguing in favor of wiping out these two important banking regulations for Freddie and Fannie.  It is a real eye-opener, and entertaining too.

Thinking back to the happy days of tiny scandals like Enron, I can recall four different Congressional hearings where executives such as Ken Lay (CEO), and Jeff Skilling (CFO) were called upon to explain what they did…and then they were jailed.  The crimes of the Enron executives were 8,000 times smaller than the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Scandal—in which Frank and his chums discarded the regulation that had required those two institutions (and others) to keep a 4% solvency reserve. Further scandal is that senior executives of Freddie and Fannie and every other financial institution in trouble contributed huge sums of money to the Democrats who ran those committees, and smaller sums to some Republicans who were also on those committees. 

Scaling this crime to Enron, we should expect to have seen 16,000 Congressional Hearings by now…with another 16,000 hearings to come soon.  Have you noticed one single Congressional Hearing yet?  No.  There have been none.  None are planned. 

Like third-world dictators, Democrats never hold themselves to the same rules they create for everyone else.  Henry Waxman will never hold Barney Frank to account.  Nancy Pelosi will never hold Henry Waxman to account. Journalists at MSNBC will demand to know which newspapers Sarah Palin reads—because they judge her to be ignorant and uninformed.

To stuff the economic wound created by Mr. Frank, the Obama administration has now announced a plan to run a deficit of about $1.8 trillion in 2009, which is about four times larger a deficit than George Bush’s most reckless year. The USA will most likely borrow this money from the government of China.  Assuming China takes on the whole deficit for us, that government would need to extract about $720 from every man, woman, and child in China.  For a family of five (including one child and two grandparents), that might be a month’s pay.  They would use that money to buy food, and other essentials, but we will use it for a high-speed train that will to connect Disneyland to Las Vegas; Obama’s new personal fleet of 28 helicopters; New grass sod in Washington DC…

The list of American folly that Chinese people will be forced to pay for goes on at a pace of $70 million per page, for over a thousand pages.


This is the nauseating cruelty of classic liberalism.  They peddle slogans like “investment”, and “caring for poor people”, but they are really just pushing pain and suffering beyond the range of television cameras. As a result, “compassionate” liberals will make life even worse for people who are already even poorer than the poorest people in this country.  Liberals will call their cruelty “change we can believe in”, and they will demand to know how conservatives could dare to hope that the plan fails.

Meanwhile, Mr. Frank still has his job in Washington, where he lectures us about “fairness” every night via the wonder of television.

A while ago, a popular semantic game was to ask, “Why do Islamic terrorists hate the United States?”

Here in Massachusetts, we should be asking, “Why do people in other States hate Massachusetts?”  One answer is that we manufacture and sell politicians like Barney Frank.  It would be okay if Frank inflicted his pain only upon those who voted for him, but that is not the case.  His insane ideas about “fairness” inflict pain upon the entire country, and now China too.

The people of Massachusetts have eaten far too much mindless liberalism—which is very much like eating far too much broccoli. As a result, Congressman Barney Frank is now a foul cloud of flatulence that only Massachusetts cannot smell.  It is time to open the window and let him out, for the sake of the other passengers in the car.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

$533 Billion now called "Slashing" by Reuters

See here that Reuters says, "Obama vows to slash deficit to $533 billion by 2013"

For perspective, that will be $120B larger than George Bush's largest deficit (2004). 
Reuters uses the word "slash" only because Obama will come down from above the astronomical deficit of $1.9 Trillion this year--which is 4.5-fold larger than the largest deficit in history.

Yes, a "Historic" Presidency going on here.
 
David Brooks, are you paying attention?  You hope Obama will prove you wrong? Really?
Too late.  You were already proven wrong by the conservatives you betrayed last fall.
Tell us all once more about how un-intellectual we are, Mr. Brooks.  That was the part I liked the best, you dope.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »