About Me

Name: Noam D. Gear
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/

United States of Zimbabwe

“The economy will get worse before it gets better.”  I have heard this predictive promise often since January, from many people and in many settings.
 
Because I was raised in Upstate New York, my ears are keenly tuned to this message of hope.  New York is stuck in its 25th year of “getting worse before it gets better”. For New Yorkers, liberal social policies have been delivering the first half (e.g. “getting worse”) of that deal for almost three decades. And now, Obama has announced that these policies will guide the whole country.
 
Obama explains, “we must build our house upon a rock, and must lay a new foundation”. Notice here that Obama uses Bible phrases to peddle his new plan.  However, his real meaning comes from his Budget Plan, not the Bible.
 
The “Rock” is the Rock of a $16 Trillion National debt that will pay for the free stuff he has budgeted for his supporters. He will grow our debt to surpass our GDP; almost tripling the National Debt by 2015. In practical terms, that would be like taking out a second and third mortgage on your house and using all of that money to throw a party for the people who approved the loans. 
 
The African country of Zimbabwe is a glittering example of how debt-based populism makes the economy “get worse before it gets better”.  President Mugabe ran his country’s debt to about 2.2 times higher than its GDP. He spent the money on his supporters, and then he inflated his currency in order to repay his creditors with worthless paper.  As a result, his country now has 22 million percent inflation, a chronic famine, and massive death, exodus, and depopulation—right in the “breadbasket of Africa”.  Citizens walk around with $10 Billion Bills in their pockets (ZWD Notes), which are not enough to purchase a meal. People who complain too loudly are shot.  In sum, Zimbabwe is a wretched genocidal utopia of Marxist “Social Justice”. It never got better, it just got worse.
 
Obama’s new “Foundation” is simply Government Employment.  Once Obama takes capital from the “wealthiest Americans” and uses it for interest payments to China, then more private enterprise will collapse. Obama will try to absorb the massive unemployment he creates by hiring millions of people into “shovel-ready” jobs for the government.
 
Cuba is a good example of what happens when Government employs everyone after it wipes out private business.  The Castro Family Government employs about 90% of the work force in Cuba. Doctors and cab drivers earn about the same pay—which is about $20 per month. Only the ruling Socialist dictators earn much higher pay, because they perform the hard work of making sure that everyone else is “equal” to each other.
 
After 100 days of the Obama Telethon, I pause to note that his new “House”, “Rock”, and “Foundation” are a dangerous sham. I refuse to believe in a President who triples the debt accrued by all previous presidents combined…telling us that it will build a great economy somehow. 

Hogwash!

History strongly suggests that this country will drown, not sail, in its new ocean of debt.
 
It is ironic that the President received an education from an elite college, then a degree from an elite law school, then lectured at a different law school, then worked as a “community organizer”, and then used inspiring oratory to overcome his own lack of experience, and so won his first term as President of Zimbabwe. Yes, President Mugabe won by a landslide in 1980 after delivering electrifying speeches to enormous rallies of supporters.  They believed that he was incredibly smart, charismatic, and that he would surely rescue them from the injustices of prosperity. And he did.
 
Another irony is that some of the Christians, for whom Obama uses Bible words, can use one breath to pray for God to alleviate the suffering in Zimbabwe, and another breath to pray for Obama to succeed with Marx’s Social Justice here in America. 

If you are a liberal reader then rejoice in knowing that my writing will get far worse before it gets any better.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Second Coming of Robert Mugabe

See Mark Sanford’s comments today

I am surprised and delighted to see that other people are beginning to see the similarity between President Mugabe in Zimbabwe and President Obama in America.

Allow me to expand it for you:
  • Both Obama and Mugabe went to elite Universities (Princeton; Oxford) 
  • Both got degrees from elite Law Schools.  (one from Harvard; two from University of London).
  • Both spent a while teaching and lecturing at a Law School. (Chicago; Zambia)
  • Both are intellectuals of reputation.
  • Both were “community organizers” (Chicago; Rhodesia)
  • Both of them are fantastic orators.  (Do you need proof?)
  • Both of them have countries with abundant and fertile agricultural lands.
  • Both of them rose to power from a new political base of young people who were persuaded that they had “no hope” without their leader.  (Pol Pot too, by the way)
  • Mugabe created a security force by hiring up many people from among his young political base of previously-hopeless people.  His security force was used to extract money and belongings from the rich and give them to the poor.  The part about giving to the poor was completely forgotten at the half-way point.  Obama has proposed the “Civilian National Security Force” that would be “as large and well funded as the US Army”.  No telling what he will use them to accomplish.
  • Both of them use Marx’s “Social Justice” rhetoric liberally when stoking their political base.
  • Both stress “Economic Justice”, and redistribution of as central to their mission.
  • Neither of them had any prior experience in managing an organization, much less a government.
  • Both fight/fought  Catholic Hospitals that served the poor.  Mugabe wanted to impose high tax on the imported medicines that were being distributed (free) to the poor.  Obama will sign FOCA and force Catholics to perform abortions—or quit medicine.
  • Both of them took immediate action to quash critics when their ideas began to fail severely.
  • Both rely on printing money to devalue currency to cope with their own budgetary incontinence—which is astronomical.  More about that later.
The similarities become smaller and less distinguishing after this.  Plus, we are only 50 days in.

Mugabe went on to use his “Security Force” to seize farms from farmers so that he could give the land to the “the poor”.  In this case, “the poor” were Mugabe’s political contributors and high-ranking  officials in his Security Force.  These people knew nothing about farming and they created a durable famine that is slowly killing 40% of the population in a region that had been known as “The Bread Basket of Africa”.  The famine is now being helped along by an outbreak of cholera, which could have been treated with medicine at Catholic Hospitals, but…oops.  Another million or more fled to Zambia and other countries. 

When inflation in the US reaches 22,000,000% per year like Zimbabwe, and when the super-intellectual Obama orders the treasury to print new $100,000,000,000-dollar notes (with his own image) so that people can use one of these notes to pay for groceries… then we will know for sure that we actually elected the second-coming of Mugabe as our president.  Of course, half of us will be dead by then.  And speaking of death…

If simple scale is applied, and if Obama manages to involve the agricultural base of the USA into one of his “Fairness” programs, then Obama’s famine will starve about 150 million Americans to death.  For comparison, that would be approximately: 70 Million more death than Mao; 120 Million more than Stalin; 60 fold more than Pol Pot; and 30-fold more than Robert Mugabe. 

I just wonder whether Obama will be the clear winner of the competition with other legendary leaders of “Social Justice”, or will he just take a spot in the middle of the pack somewhere.  Time will tell.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »